Sunscreen Choice Dilemmas - How Best to Protect Your Family

After having experienced melanomas twice in ourmost sunscreens either have no UVA protection, or
family that both proved fatal after long years ofvery little.
treatments and belief that the war on cancer was• Sunscreens and Melanoma?
being won, I decided I needed to be more clued upBasal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma
about the use of sunscreens. Ever since the childrenseem to be undisputed skin cancers aligned with sun
were very small, we have religiously applieddamage. Melanoma, as a potentially fatal skin cancer,
sunscreen whenever out in the wonderful sun. Thisis not yet indisputably caused by sun damage.
has now become almost a daily task alongsideHowever, sun damage starts a process that can lead
brushing ones teeth. From my teenage years, whento melanomas.
we definitely didn't apply anything to STOP theSo, sunscreens can protect you from basal and
tanning process, to needing to protect my childrensquamous cell carcinomas, but only indirectly from
from the sun's harmful rays, I have dealt with quite amelanomas. Bottom line, regardless, is it's optimal not
mind shift.to get burnt!
However, now the question seems to be whether or• Chemical vs Natural sunscreens?
not the sunscreens out there are actually moreSo then I get to the chemical list of sunscreens and
harmful than good? How's that for a mind shift?find many, or most of them, are said to be toxic,
Chemicals in sunscreens are anything fromwith some even potentially carcinogenic, with heaps
carcinogenic to gender bending to endocrineof repercussions to ones natural health or immune
disruptors, never mind plain old skin irritants! How cansystem. The mineral, or natural, alternatives are the
children under 5, with their tender skin, deal with thesunscreens with zinc oxide and/or titanium dioxide
toxicities of some of these sunscreen chemicals?and they physically block both UVA and UVB rays
The sunscreen debate has raged for years in everyvery effectively.
direction, with scientific evidence being presented atZinc oxide has been used for many decades in
every turn that invariably has some flaw for thehealing ointments and one of the best known
opposing argument to trash as insufficient, incorrectapplications is for babies bottom nappy rashes. Zinc
or false. It leaves us bombarded with informationitself is very healing. Titanium on the other hand has
with no easy path to a clear-cut decision.many unhealthy associations.
These are my dilemmas:• What SPF level is best?
• Is the sun good or bad for you?Paying for SPF levels greater than 30 seems a bit of
I know too much will cause damage to the skin.a waste, as SPF 30 provides 97% protection from
However, UVB rays actually enable our skin toUVB rays. Anything higher is really marginally small,
produce Vitamin D, which in turn repairs the damagedbut the price differences seem to be quite radical!
DNA and thereby prevents development ofMost of the high level SPF's are obtained using
cancerous cells. So, by using a good SPF factor (UVBchemical sunscreens in combination with mineral
protection) sunscreen, we actually prevent oursunscreens. However, they still require that you
bodies' natural self-healing capabilities.reapply frequently.
We need Vitamin D. This cannot be stressed enough.• Sunscreen added ingredients?
The best source is from the sun, and this is ofThere seems to be a long list of ingredients and I'm
course FREE!never sure any of them are actually adding any
The trick is to get the balance right.benefit to the sunscreen. If not adding benefit, they
• UVA vs UVB?must surely detract from the overall effect of the
UVA light rays are longer than UVB and so cause asunscreen, or dilute its capability?
deeper level of skin damage, skin cancer and theAntioxidants, flavonoids, amino acids and such, are
aging wrinkles. To produce Vitamin D you need UVBgreat to help the skin repair DNA damage. Basically,
light for just 10-20 minutes between 10am -2pmanything that will boost the body's own fight against
when these rays are at their peak, or most direct,free radicals, are worth looking out for as additives in
unprotected! This of course directly contradicts whata sunscreen. It's great to find a sunscreen where the
most Cancer organizations and official health bodieslabeling explains them all openly, but that is quite rare.
tell us. Besides this, the UVA rays actually deplete theConclusions.
Vitamin D created!1. Choose a sunscreen with both UVA and UVB
UVA rays cause damage all day, even when it isprotection. UVA needs to be as high as possible, with
cloudy. UVB only really get to you when they arean SPF of 30. Physical, or mineral, sunscreens are the
direct, hence the 10am - 2pm rule, although thisbest choice here.
obviously changes with latitudes.2. If out in the sun all day long, wear sunscreen all
Blocking UVB alone, seems to be the worst possibleday and reapply regularly.
option as this allows the damaging UVA rays through,3. Choose a sunscreen with added ingredients that
without the UVB rays that help the vitamin Dbenefit the skin or provide free radical scavenging
production that heals you. Bit of a vicious cycle herecapabilities
don't you think? Also, you're going to stay out in the4. Otherwise, wear sunscreen all day on the exposed
sun longer than you would with no protection,parts like face, neck, ears, legs and forearms for
because you aren't getting burnt. So the UVA raysUVA damage protection. But try and get some free
get more time to do their damage!Vitamin D through sun exposure midday-ish for just
So UVA protection is actually the real one we need15 - 20 minutes, without getting sun burnt of course.
protection from, more so than UVB it seems, and