Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer - The Truth Is Not Yet Known

"It's not that people are ignorant, but that they knowIn fact, young women who develop breast cancer
so many things that just ain't true."when they are pregnant may, indeed, have a worse
MARK TWAINprognosis and a decreased survival. We've not
The banner headline on the Susan G. Komen For Thestudied enough women to be certain about this. Dr.
Cure website homepage, "Pregnant Women withBeadle went to great lengths to make sure the
Breast Cancer Do Not Have Worse Outcomes" isreader understood that there are still some missing
unfortunately somewhat misleading. Perhaps thepieces to this puzzle, still many things to learn and
editor should have read the paper published by Dr.discover about breast cancer that occurs in young
Beadle more closely. What Dr. Beadle actuallywomen when they are pregnant.
reported in her article published in the March 15, 2009Overall, all young women who develop breast cancer
issue of Cancer was:have a dismal prognosis. Pregnancy may or may not
"The lack of a statistically significant correlationmake things worse. I hope that Dr. Beadle and other
between the diagnosis of pregnancy-associatedresearchers will be able to clarify the true character
breast cancer and a worse outcome does notof pregnancy-associated breast cancer in the near
necessarily preclude a true association."future. But at the present time we simply do not
Which is to say, Dr. Beadle cannot say for certainknow for sure whether or not a pregnancy confers a
that young women who are diagnosed with breastworse outcome for young women with breast
cancer when they are pregnant have the samecancer.
prognosis as non-pregnant women their same age. Dr.The news media and their ambitious headlines
Beadle goes into great detail to explain the manytypically try to grab for a hook that will capture a
flaws in her otherwise excellent study of 652reader, but in their clamor to be noticed they often
women, less than 35 years old, who were treated atfall short of the mark of accurate reporting. We may
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1973 andforgive CNN for these hungry oversights for we
2006. Dr. Beadle was very thorough in explaining thatknow they are going for the sensational, not the
the data, though suggestive, were not definitive.substantive. But when the leading breast cancer
Indeed, it is too soon to jump to conclusions. We'vefoundation falls short in reporting the results of an
been down that wrong road before - with hormoneimportant paper such as this it leaves all women less,
replacement therapy and, more recently, with dailynot more informed. It is a disappointment, to say the
use of alcohol - and it is not yet clear what the trueleast.
story is regarding pregnancy and breast cancer; so,(c) 2009, Dr. Kathleen Ruddy. All rights reserved.
beware banner headlines that proclaim conclusionsReprints welcomed so long as article and by-line are
that are not yet certain.not edited and all links are made live.