Motion for New Trial: A Good Idea? The $16 Million Question

In a case illustrating the potential danger of seeking aN.Y. Specifically, it was alleged that they ground and
new trial following a jury verdict, a New York jurybuffed gaskets and that they didn't know they were
awarded three former railroad employees $16 millionworking with asbestos products. LIRR only provided
for their asbestosis and COPD on April 27.safety goggles. At trial, LIRR argued that exposure
Interestingly, a new trial was previously orderedto asbestos at the railroad had not caused the
following a 1999 award of $800,000, which was heldalleged diseases.
to be excessive after LIRR moved for relief. LincolnExperts: Plaintiffs relied on the testimony of Victor M.
Aquirre was awarded $6 million, cigarette smokerMarchione, a pulmonologist who testified that the
James Harrington was awarded $2.4 million after hisplaintiffs had asbestosis; and Michael Ellenbecker, a
40 percent liability for cigarette smoking and Albitoprofessor of industrial hygiene at the University of
Velez-Zapata was awarded $8 million. We do not yetMassachusetts in Lowell, Mass. LIRR called Doreen
have any information regrding possible appeals.Addrizzo-Harris, a pulmonary function testing expert
Aquirre, Harrington and Velez-Zapata alleged thatwho testified that the plaintiffs did not have
their diseases were the result of exposure toasbestosis. Judge Laurence Knipel presiding over the
asbestos in the 1970s while working at the LIRR'strial, which began April 18. Aquirre, Harrington and
repair shop in Morris Park, Queens, N.Y., and itsVelez-Zapata v. Long Island Rail Road (NY Sup., Kings
current site, Hillside Maintenance Complex in Jamaica,Co.